Re: Which E-Mail Address is Reported to ISPs?
"Mike Easter" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.help |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dick K wrote: > I use the Email Submission System to forward > spam to SpamCop. Which means that your submission corresponds to a registered reporting account, which is also true if you used the webparser on your spam. > I note from SpamCop FAQs that > "All spam reports include a valid email > address for you". You are referring to those words in http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/168.html How is my personal data used (not used)? (privacy policy) The par in question sez... Privacy Limitations: Information you submit in your spam reports is considered to be in the public domain. This information may be shared with others - in fact, that is the entire purpose of SpamCop. SpamCop makes some attempt to conceal the identity of the recipient of the spam, but this method is not foolproof and should not be relied on. All spam reports include a valid email address for you and the IP address which you used to submit the report. ... which doesn't make any sense to me as I'm reading it -- so I'll explain how it is in my own words. When you submit a spamcop report, the standard SC configuration is that the submitting reporter's address is 'blinded' from the recipient who gets the reports. That is, SC has an automated mungeing system which replaces obvious instances of your address with x and SC uses a reportid address instead of your own to provide an address for the recipient to reply to. So, a recipient would email to the SC reportid addy and then SC would forward that reply to you. There are many ways you can provide some identity to the recipient who is getting a copy of the spam. First, you can choose to do your reporting unmunged, which many reporters do. Some providers will not accept munged, and some reporters don't want to be munged. In addition, even the reporters who choose to have their address munged, may be uniquely identified from something obscured in the headers or body of the spam evidence -- a condition which SC can't prevent. As long as you or SC are providing the recipient with a copy of the spam evidence there is potential for communicating the identity to the recipient -- so total prevention of that problem would require not sending any evidence. That is the condition of mole reporting -- which is really non-reporting. > I'd be grateful if anyone > could tell me which address this is - the > e-mail address I've registered with SpamCop > or the sender's address from the e-mails > which I use to submit spam? The registered address is what is the registered address. Nothing about your sending from ie submitting from address to spamcop is going into the report. However, what /is/ going into the report is whatever is in the spam evidence which hasn't been munged. -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin