Re: I'm a bit at a loss here... (9 Million questions - or less)

In news:[email protected],
Mike Easter had this to say:

>>> a recently started webhosting
>>> company.
>>
>>> I found the ISP section for SpamCop, signed up, configured it for
>>> hourly reports, and set it to the abuse@ email address.
>
>> More importantly, for your purposes, for the spamvertiser, SC
>> resolves the IP of the spamvertised site, uses the RIR to determine
>> a contact. SC does not make notifies based simply on some domainname.
>>
>> For example and for purposes of illustration, if SC were going to
>> notify as if the body of your message contained a spamvertiser, it
>> would derive this:
>>
>> Parsing input: http://www.whathostingshould.be
>> Host www.whathostingshould.be (checking ip) = 69.16.211.62
>> host 69.16.211.62 (getting name) = creston.dailydns.com.
>> Routing details for 69.16.211.62
>> [refresh/show] Cached whois for 69.16.211.62 : [email protected]
>
> In addition to that, there are about 92 other domainnames occupying
> 69.16.211.62 rDNS creston.dailydns.com
>
> If any of them were spamvertised, the notify would go to liquidweb.
> My source of information about that isn't necessarily accurate or
> uptodate, for example that source doesn't show whathostingshould.be
> at this time
>
> As I check on the registration for whathostingshould.be - I see that
> it has recently changed.  It was reg'd Jan 9, but it was updated Feb
> 12 and your name, address, & gmail appear, along with your G3
> organization.  So I'm thinking that maybe the IP for the site changed
> or something which causes my lookup for all of the sites at
> 69.16.211.62 to not be completely accurate.

I based it on the IP address and the source of the nameservers should be 
altered to reflect the kgiii.info information and *ideally* the abuse 
reports would go to me rather than my providers or, at least, to our abuse 
address in the form or hourly reports. (Or at least that's how it seems to 
work and that's what the FAQs said to do unless I missed something.) When 
that option came up then I'd be the "third party interested..." tick box I 
assume as my server space is only leased and on leased IP addresses, etc...

So, I can't think of any way to test it. And yeah, that information's 
correct.

Galen
-- 
http://www.whathostingshould.be - We are what hosting SHOULD be.