Re: Re: Spam as pictures

Hello
Forwarding myself the spam is a bad process because the "abuse", usually 
the same organization as the spamer,  punishes the plaintiff and not the 
faulty. I suffered that with AOL (all  my mails to AOL domain are now 
discarded) and  now for this  reason I use Spamcop.

die spammer wrote:

> yep, forward the spam to spamcop then get abuse email address when the 
> report comes back. Dont "send" the report but use the abuse email 
> address and manually forward the spam using the abuse email address...
>
>
>
>
>
> Chris Wright wrote:
>
>> Joël Balazuc wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Mr Spamcop.
>>

>>> The new process of pollution by spam consists to send  pictures (JPG 
>>> files).  Forwarded  to Spamcop as body in a spam report , this 
>>> pictures are not analysed (ie  OCRed)  and the true spammer is not 
>>> reported as an abuser.  Any solution ?
>>> I apologize as a french speaking newbie.
>>> Joel
>>>
>>
>> my 0.02p  (Or Euro in your case)
>>
>> Maybe not the contents of the pictures are scanned, but 9/10, that is 
>> just the site being spamvertised.
>>
>> The real info is in the header information which is parsed by SPAMCOP 
>> and does go towards tracking and stats etc.
>>
>> If it lists a site in the image, you could always do a manual lookup 
>> and abuse address for that site to the reports.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> SpamCop-Help mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-help
>
>

-- 
Joël Balazuc

PS : Ne jamais m'envoyer de courrier en copie cachée : à ma demande, il sera rebuté par mon fournisseur d'accès car considéré comme du spam.