Re: What's wrong now, Spamcop?

Garen Erdoisa wrote:

> I really don't think that we are in disagreement here, as I stated in
> my post quoting myself "These are my thoughts on this issue". That
> means that it's my opinion. No where in it did I say or even suggest
> that my opinion was a fact. You seem to have inferred otherwise.

Oh, I see.  I tho't maybe you had some other information as a basis for
your opinion.

If I'm understanding you correctly, you are saying "On the basis of
this, I think the stats reflect reporter reports and not spamtrap
reports."

Then I have another question.  Do you think that the stats reflect a
'sizeable percentage' of the reporter reports, and therefore one could
surmise that 75% of the 3 million spams are derived from spamtraps, or
do you think that the stats only reflect a small percentage of the
reporter reports, and therefore one would surmise that a much much
smaller percentage than 75% of the 3 million are derived from spamtraps?

Along the lines of what Jim was asking:

Jim wrote:
>> Does he know how many users there are of SPAMCOP?
>
> I would like to know how many users of SpamCop there are.  What
> percentage of spam reports are coming from users versus Spam traps.


-- 
Mike Easter
kibitzer, not SC admin