Re: Daughters email account being attacked: Best action?
"Mike Easter" <[email protected]> Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:21:02 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.help |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mike Easter wrote: > If she suddenly started getting a lot more spam of a wide and diverse > nature so that she is now getting 500 spams in a much shorter time > than she did prior to becoming a spamcop reporter, it is more likely > that she has begun to report spam in an insecure manner, discussed > below, and as a consequence of the insecure spam handling she has > gotten herself onto many more spam lists. The topic of spamcop reporters getting more spam after becoming reporters has been discussed before, where the sense of the reporter's increase is that it isn't just due to the progressively increasing nature of a given address which is getting spam to get more and more spam as time goes on. A new spamcop reporter might handle their spam insecurely -- just like a non-reporter might handle their spam insecurely, but some people begin to handle more spam insecurely as a consequence of becoming a reporter. Whereas a non-reporter might handle very little spam insecurely because they delete all or almost all of it unopened, some reporters open all the spam they are receiving and now reporting insecurely and online. This insecure reporting 'telegraphs' the information to spam generators via web bugs that a particular address is both receiving and opening its spam -- and such an address is more valuable. That address may go onto more spam lists than before and consequently get more spam than before. A spam reporter should not be handling spam insecurely in the course of reporting it. -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin