Re: Insulin pumpers headers

Tim McGraw wrote:

> But we've already established that the way their mail sw works is an
> SC parse won't finger it as the source - so it's impossible for them
> to be listed from list traffic.

You mean it is /currently/ impossible to be listed from list traffic to
a nonmailhosted reporter.  Looking at the headers, it is possible that
the parser might've tripped while it was unfamiliar with the server
chain.  Or that it might still trip for a mailhosted account.

> Which probably means someone is lying.

We have incomplete information because we can't see the evidence.  In
the past when we the public could access the evidence, we would be able
to 'reparse' the headers that had caused the bizsystems server to become
listed and perhaps find that now the bizsystems server wouldn't be named
as source, whereas/but it had been before.

That doesn't mean that someone is lying;  it means that the
nonmailhosted parse doesn't currently name the server.  It is also
possible that a mailhosted parse might still show the bizsystem's server
as source, since the algorithm's logic is different in several areas for
mailhosted vs non-mailhosted.

-- 
Mike Easter
kibitzer, not SC admin