Re: Insulin pumpers headers
"Mike Easter" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tim McGraw wrote: > Mike Easter wrote: >> Tim McGraw wrote: >> >>> Do the headers hint at what list software is being used? >> >> My gut and some other findings like where Michael A. Robinton >> converses are causing me to lean toward believing the software is >> Majordomo http://www.greatcircle.com/majordomo/ > > If you are correct then someone /is/ lying. > > The link you provided says one of the features of Majordomo is that it > "Supports confirmation of subscriptions, to protect against forged > subscription requests." You like that 'lying' term more than I do. Not only is it inflammatory, it presumes facts not in evidence, including intent. It is my understanding that majordomo supports confirmed optin by default. What I am not up to understanding is how the IP admin has chosen to configure the 'pathways' of using majordomo and its incorporation of the human oversight and profile process -- all of which is elaborated from an 'external' administration by email description at the link I gave. That is, I can read what a 'lay' non-IT-tech can do administratively from the 'outside' of majordomo which name is not even mentioned in the administrative pages. What I am not familiar with is how to IT-tech configure the actual software majordomo so as to both enable confirmed optin while maintaining the current human oversight profile management descibed in the length external email administration. That is, said another way: There is a very 'elaborate' external administration by email routine established in 1999 for the IP volunteers by Michael and Mary Jean who are familiar with the 'workings' of majordomo - which I am not - and those elaborate external administrative routines result in the type of non-confirmed optin which we are now dealing with, and with which the human oversight business is met to the satisfaction of someone adminstrative at IP. What would need to happen would be a rewrite [who knows how much, a little or a lot?] and retraining of the external administrative process for the majordomo which would incorporate its presumed 'builtin' confirmed optin character. However -- what we presume is that the *current* version of majordomo does confirmed optin by default. We don't know which version of majordomo we are dealing with here, and in fact, it is currently a guess as to whether it is actually majordomo of any version or not. -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin