Re: Insulin pumpers headers

Mike Easter wrote:
> Tim McGraw wrote:
> 
>> If you are correct then someone /is/ lying.
>>
>> The link you provided says one of the features of Majordomo is that it
>> "Supports confirmation of subscriptions, to protect against forged
>> subscription requests."
> 
> You like that 'lying' term more than I do.  Not only is it inflammatory,
> it presumes facts not in evidence, including intent.

Fair enough.

> What I am not familiar with is how to IT-tech configure the actual
> software majordomo so as to both enable confirmed optin while
> maintaining the current human oversight profile management descibed in
> the length external email administration.

Well stated.

> What would need to happen would be a rewrite [who knows how much, a
> little or a lot?] and retraining of the external administrative process
> for the majordomo which would incorporate its presumed 'builtin'
> confirmed optin character.  However -- what we presume is that the
> *current* version of majordomo does confirmed optin by default.  We
> don't know which version of majordomo we are dealing with here, and in
> fact, it is currently a guess as to whether it is actually majordomo of
> any version or not.

Noted.