Re: Pump and Dump
"Berny" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Tim McGraw" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > Andy wrote: > > > > 1. Is P&D actually illegal or is it a case of 'caveat emptor'? > > Illegal. See http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/05/061205.asp > > > 2. If it is illegal then where would you make a report? Given that there > > appear to be only 39 possible beneficiaries in this company it shouldn't be > > too hard to trace the scammer. > > The conventional wisdom seems to be that investors, NOT the owners of > the small or nanocrap company themselves, buy up penny stocks creating > an artificial demand through spam, raising the stock's price for a very > short period. At which time those investors obviously sell. Yeah, but these stocks are so thinly held, I think that the investors are the principals in most of these. That "It wasn't us " excuse just doesn't wash look at KooKy Oil ;) , they contract with nonexistent companies for meaningless well surveys etc. according to their announcements.. I'd be really surprised , if at the end of the day the spam and some principal at kooky are well connected.