Re: Spamcop mail
"Petzl" </@/.cn>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"G|_|Y |\/|AC0|\|" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > > Petzl wrote... >> >> G|_|Y |\/|AC0|\| wrote... >>> >>>> For a spam proof/resistant email account the only effective one is >>>> http://www.spamcop.net/ces/individuals.shtml >>> >>> Nonsense. Spamcop is a good choice, but it is not the only effective >>> choice. It might not even be the best choice; Tuffmail has many useful >>> features that Spamcop lacks, for example. (That doesn't make them >>> better, >>> of course, what is important is whether your needs are addressed). >>> >>> http://www.tuffmail.com/features.php >> >> Not IMO!! >> >> Unless it notifies ISP's of caught spam as SpamCop does sounds pretty >> useless >> >> Just bitbin'ing spam does nothing to reduce spam > > You can report spam sent to a tuffmail account (or an account at any other > ISP) > to spamcop almost as easily as you can from a spamcop mail account. And > you > can choose not to report anything with an email account from any vendor. > Spamcop reporting/DNSBL = unique, unmatched, and insanely great. Spamcop > email > account = pretty good, but doesn't have important features that vendors > like > sneakemail and tuffmail have. > > In fact, if you do a feature-by-feature comparison, there is, IMO, only > one area where a spamcop email account beats a tuffmail email account > (but it is a big enough advantage to me that I use a spamcop email account > as my public email address); having "@spamcop.net" at the end of your > email > address tends to reduce your incoming spam load by scaring some spammers. > > G.M. SpamCop so far does not need extra features of tuffmail (why would you want to fix something not broken) SpamCop email sets-up the reporting so it'sVery Easy Reporting (VER) used (not a afterthought) Just a click of a mouse has all spam in your bulk folder selected and reported This ofeten stops the hole that spammer is crawling through Other pluses are that SpamCop allow efficient whitelisting which is missing in Tuffmail? The methods of tuffmail sorting spam will mean a very high false positive without whitelisting with a lot of legitimate email blended in with spam. SpamCop email also use spamassasin but with the very much needed and unique whitelist of one's own creation (not only email addresses but domains and even countries) Also they do not use the best and most accurate of Blocklists our very own SCBL which lists spammers as they try to send sam not aterwards and releasing that IP when spam stops. Other blocklists used by tuffmail just add to lists removal from lists is nt that effiecient And yes SpamCop email has even more to offer than is said here