Re: Sending Non Delivery Reports? (was Pump and Dump)
Blammo <[email protected]> Sat, 6 May 2006 07:15:50 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | RM Gates |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 05 May 2006, - Garen Erdoisa entered spamcop and left news:[email protected]: > AFAIK It was never intended for SPF > to check the From: header given in the message data because to do so you > first have to accept the data. > ... I know that, but the common response to "someone's forging my domain" is "get SPF", which doesn't exactly stop anyone from forging your domain. It won't even stop many bounces since most of us try not to bounce anyway (I mean, you expect servers that bounce to use SPF?). > > That policy is up to the mail administrator. They can accept and tag > emails that fail an SPF check if they so choose. Well that's what its good for. Why not expand on that and have a "SMTP=Yes" or "SMTP=No" text record for PTRs? Put authenticated senders in the Received header? Some DNSBLs I tag, but if it's in two I reject, math works too. -- | Ric |