Re: Sending Non Delivery Reports? (was Pump and Dump)
"Mike Easter" <[email protected]> Sat, 6 May 2006 12:05:17 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Michael R N Dolbear wrote: > Mike Easter >> nothing whatsoever, with the >> possible exception of some daft end user, blocks their email based on >> the From. > > Me! Me! Me! > > You don't, I think, read the forum, but under "how to use Spamcop mail > features" "personal blacklist" I noted that I block mail that says it > comes from ebay.com, paypal.com and some others (I have just added > chase.com and irs.gov). Some other users have taken the idea up. > > The fraudsters whose emails I wish to block *have* to use plausible > Froms and so I exploit that. Exploit? How about mis-tag? I just looked back thru' my collection of legitimate mail and I have lots of goodmail items from ebay and paypal. Whitelisting Froms isn't a bad idea. Blacklisting From domains seems like an idea fraught with the possibility of false positives. Then you get to deal with what you do with your positives and how much you like digging thru' your spam to find the occasional false positive. Sometimes having a bright idea about how to block something isn't such a bright idea after all. My experience with phishes is that they are mostly sourced from listed open proxies. I would much rather tag as spam something coming from an open proxy than something coming from a paypal or ebay.address. I think the best kind of filter is one which never has a false positive ever, even if an occasional spam leaks thru'. Creating a filter tag which might possibly have a false positive is not a good strategy in my opinion. -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin