Re: BlueSecurity/Blue Frog

ken wrote:
> Mike Easter wrote:

> Frustrated, hell, yes!  In five years of feeding SpamCop with, so far
> 110,000 bits of trash, I find I only get more spam.

There is almost nothing about spamcop reporting that is going to get you
less spam.

>> In the recent ddos incident, they acted very badly, diverting their
>> problem onto innocent others and displaying their 'mentality'.
>
> By turning the DDoS back onto a couple trojaned proxies as collateral
> damage..  even the best of the 'fighters' have made a few "errors".
> By turning it back at the perp,  he did get the message. !

That is not at all an accurate description of what happened.  BS
diverted the attack after they fell by turning their own nameservice
[falsifying their nameservice] toward a blog site which they were only
using and which wasn't their IP and which was hosting numerous other
innocent bystanders.  That site suffered DoS crash because of BS's
nameservice 'defensive' manipulation.

Here's a description of the BS nameservice 'forgery' effect on the
innocent Six Apart http://q.queso.com/archives/001917  The dishonor of
Blue Security

>> They are a rotten bunch

> Harsh, without an iota of proof.  The resumes of the principals reads
> far differently.

The purpose of giving financial position to some 'principals' with
favorable sounding so-called credentials so as to get their backing or
support or the use of the credentials is to lure in the investors or
venture capitalists by making the whole thing sound positive and more
legitimate.  It is a big snake oil operation, song and dance, dog and
pony show.

-- 
Mike Easter
kibitzer, not SC admin