Re: BlueSecurity/Blue Frog

steve auvache wrote:
> Interesting comments.  Were this posted elsewhere and by a different
> author it may be said to have been posted by one of the spammers who
> have been upset by BlueSecurity.  Whose side are you on?

Not BS or the spamvertisers they collude with..

> I wish them every success in their fight against spam and if I can
> help I will.

Then you should become a blue frogger and also follow their other
requests to hype the service -- all of which helps their business model,
and disregard their lying misrepresentations.

Here are a couple of articles showing the discrepancies in BS version of
events

http://www.wired.com/news/technology/security/0,70831-0.html?tw=wn_index_2
I'm the Blue Security Spammer

http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=187200875
Blue Security Denies It's At Fault In Blog Outage --  "But if my couch
is on fire, I don't push it out of my house and into my neighbor's. It
just wasn't ethical for Blue Security to not sound the alarm with Six
Apart, and instead to silently redirect the [DoS] traffic to them."


-- 
Mike Easter
kibitzer, not SC admin