Re: A new excuse for the sending of spam

"Robert Blair" <[email protected]> Thu, 11 May 2006 06:09:18 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.user
Organization SpamCop
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 11 May 2006 00:39:50 UTC, "Ant" <[email protected]> wrote:

> <quote>
> The message carried your return address, so it was either a genuine mail
> from you, or a sender address was faked and your e-mail address abused
> by third party, in which case we apologize for undesired notification.
>  
> We do try to minimize backscatter for more prominent cases of UBE and
> for infected mail, but for less obvious cases of UBE some balance
> between losing genuine mail and sending undesired backscatter is sought,
> and there can be some collateral damage on both sides.
> </quote>

If they went that far (to examine the email) you would think they 
could look at the FROM and the source and determine the FROM was a 
fake.

I do occasionally send email from a different domain than the domain 
of the FROM so some of my email may seem to have a fake FROM.  I would
not be too concerned if they did not send a delivery failure notice 
because of the apparent fake FROM, it is the chance I take.


-- 
Robert Blair