Re: A new excuse for the sending of spam
"Robert Blair" <[email protected]> Thu, 11 May 2006 06:09:18 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 11 May 2006 00:39:50 UTC, "Ant" <[email protected]> wrote: > <quote> > The message carried your return address, so it was either a genuine mail > from you, or a sender address was faked and your e-mail address abused > by third party, in which case we apologize for undesired notification. > > We do try to minimize backscatter for more prominent cases of UBE and > for infected mail, but for less obvious cases of UBE some balance > between losing genuine mail and sending undesired backscatter is sought, > and there can be some collateral damage on both sides. > </quote> If they went that far (to examine the email) you would think they could look at the FROM and the source and determine the FROM was a fake. I do occasionally send email from a different domain than the domain of the FROM so some of my email may seem to have a fake FROM. I would not be too concerned if they did not send a delivery failure notice because of the apparent fake FROM, it is the chance I take. -- Robert Blair