Re: BlueSecurity/Blue Frog

Tim McGraw <[email protected]> Thu, 11 May 2006 08:50:34 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.user
Organization SpamCop
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Geoffrey Hyde wrote:
> 
> I fail to see where you have offered conclusive proof that BS computers are 
> "zombied" users.  From what I can see, the program is of a type which the 
> user can uninstall if they choose to do so.  If you have conclusive evidence 
> to the contrary, please post it here.

Google "bluefrog" and "zombie" and you'll see that a lot of people agree 
with Vanguard.

One blogger called them "voluntary zombies," which is a good descriptor.

> While I may appear to be supporting BS users, I do not.  However, they seem 
> to be going to an extraodinary length to get spammers shut down.  Which is 
> in the final analysis a good thing.

Here in the US the government has gone to extraordinary lengths to "stop 
terrorism." However, the methods the government has used to do that - 
infringing on well-established civil liberties - is not seen as a good 
thing by perhaps a majority of the population.

I believe this argument is listed at 
http://www.aros.net/~wenglund/Logic101a.htm but I wouldn't know EXACTLY 
which one it is.

> At the moment you are little better than a troll which posts in order to 
> gain pleasure.  If you wish to continue this futile method of posting 
> unsubstantiated claims please be aware that other intelligent users of this 
> newsgroup may start to ignore you.

Now that argument I KNOW is listed there.

I believe Vanguard and like what he has to say.