Re: BlueSecurity/Blue Frog

Berny wrote:

> I'd rather the
> sender got the 5xx notice, even my friends.

Being configured so that *your* receiving server can reject highly
suspicious spam is a very healthy structure.  Presumably there would be
some alternate pathway by which false positive rejections can get it
straightened out.

Many people are not in a situation where they control the server;  or
many recipients don't like for their *own* senders of goodmail to get
rejected, because many of those would-be recipients and their would-be
senders don't have access to the alternate channels.


-- 
Mike Easter
kibitzer, not SC admin