Re: Trying to find out cause of blacklisting
Ejo <[email protected]> Fri, 12 May 2006 20:25:16 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamcop.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | SpamCop |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mike Easter wrote: > James wrote: > >> I've been running mail servers (qmail) for about a decade, and I found >> out yesterday that one of them had been blacklisted by SpamCop. > > You could have found out a lot more information here or even all by > yourself by naming the IP here then, which you didn't do, or by > following the links yourself which are provided for a listed IP, which > are no longer provided to the public for an unlisted IP. > > The other advantage of naming the IP here would be the possibility that > some of us here might be able to 'guess' at the problem for some > particular server. Another advantage would be that given an IP, we can > say how any spamcop report about that IP would be addressed. > > It is also possible that if the listing were caused by hitting spamtraps > alone that no address would have been provided any reports about the > spamsourcing. > >> nobody >> from SpamCop has replied to my request for details of exactly why it >> was blacklisted. > > If it were listed for hitting spamtraps, the evidence is not provided. > Also, if the form of your request were to 'dispute' the listing, that > won't get you anywhere. The deputy would look at the parse for the > spamtrap hits and find the spamsource to have been accurately derived, > and the dispute would be ignored. > > An admin can make request to be notified about spamcop reports, but the > admin won't get links to the evidence for spamtrap hits. > > Servers are most often listed because of some kind of backscatter or > autoresponder behavior -- in which the server receives a spam and > accepts the spam for delivery and then can't deliver the spam to the > mailbox, and so then the server which has foolishly accepted a spam it > can't deliver decides to create a newmail addressed to the spam's bogus > From which might be a reporter or a spamtrap.. > > That newmail hits a spamtrap and that abusive backscatter is spamcop > reportable and contributes to the server becoming spamcop blocklisted. > >> If I could get a copy of the offending message, with full headers, it >> would be possible to find out how/why this happened, as I don't want >> it to happen again. > > If it hit a spamtrap, that's not going to happen. If it hit a reporter, > every SC report is reported to what is presumed to be the appropriate > admin to be notified. If you aren't the one, then someone else got the > report with a link to the evidence. > >> I have had no other reports of Spam from that server, so it makes it >> all the more perplexing. If somebody could point me to somebody who >> could help me on this, I'd appreciate it. > > How did you try to contact a SC person and what is the IP of the > previously listed server? > Mike: why are your replies so wordy?