Re: BlueSecurity/Blue Frog

Geoffrey Hyde wrote:
> I don't see where their reporting methods are bad, in fact, to look
> at it from a SC point of view, ISPs consider SC bad because they
> wind up on blocklists.

As more people realize what the scbl does, I believe an increasing 
number of ISPs consider SC good.

As for BS reporting methods, it was already demonstrated statistically 
that BS could not possibly do what their Web site says they do - check 
the spamvertized URL in every offending email.