Re: Blue Frog calls it quits?

Turan Fettahoglu wrote:
> 
> No matter if Bluefrog was good or bad: they had a successful idea how to 
> kick spammers out of business, and this idea should be carried on by someone 
> else. 

It was not successful; it produced no profit and had to be abandoned.

The "idea" also ran counter to the cooperative spirit of the Internet.

> Any e-mail provider can introduce a similar thing, and the spam mafia 
> cannot attack hundreds of e-mail providers.

You misunderestimate them. They already do attack thousands of email 
providers.