Re: Re: Empty message apparently not tokenized
Brian Burton <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:28:09 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>Appending a blank line to the spam message below >>causes the header to be tokenized. >>Therefore it seems to me that the failure >>to tokenize the header when there is no blank line present >>could be considered to be a design problem. This is unquestionably a bug in the SP parser. I just don't have the time to fix it for a few days. Sorry. In the meantime if you are using procmail you can add this recipe to eliminate these without even requiring SP. It's a workaround until I get the real parser fix in place: :0 B: # if body has only whitespace characters *$ ! [^ ] junkfile All the best, ++Brian ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642