Re: Re: Empty message apparently not tokenized
"Jem" <[email protected]> Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:19:19 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> >>Appending a blank line to the spam message below > >>causes the header to be tokenized. > >>Therefore it seems to me that the failure > >>to tokenize the header when there is no blank line present > >>could be considered to be a design problem. > > This is unquestionably a bug in the SP parser. I just don't have the > time to fix it for a few days. Sorry. In the meantime if you are using > procmail you can add this recipe to eliminate these without even > requiring SP. It's a workaround until I get the real parser fix in > place: Interesting, I just came back to this list because after a while of leaving my spamprobe setup alone I did try the latest version (still using hashes - very fast). I encountered the exact same problem. It is just a trivial bug, like you said inserting the blank line makes these 'turdlets' properly scored. No other bugs that I can see in v1.4a using Hashed-array-cached database. On a different note, I have been using the hash approach and have found over many months that even with pretty small hashes (default size, 16 MB) I am getting very good results. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642