Re: Re: Empty message apparently not tokenized
"Jem" <[email protected]> Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:38:41 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Cool! What sort of cleanup do you perform on these small hash files? > I'd like to add a bit more about the hash format in the readme and > cleanup is an important factor with that format. You know, the cleanup is one thing I have struggled with. To be honest for a long time I used no cleanup at all. I know the hash collisions are overwriting terms but I thought, heck, it's probably more or less throwing out random terms. Recently I have been using cleanup 4 40 But it seems I'm getting more classification errors than when I was doing no cleanups. Not sure how to optimally tweak this. Very happy with the hashes overall though. I liked the fixed size database tremendously ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642