Re: Spamprobe -D option
"Jem" <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:23:18 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Maybe I didn't word that well but what it's supposed to say is that the > database in -D is meant to provide an initial value for terms that are > not yet in the person's own database. So if "obstacle" is not in your > database and you specify a shared database using -D that contains > "obstacle" then SP will use the counts from the shared database for > "obstacle" and then add "obstacle" to your database. From that point on > it will always use the values from your database. Veering off topic a bit, if you want to purely use the shared database for scoring, with no individual database consulted at all, is it OK to use only the -d option alone? This is what I have been doing for two accounts. The only thing I wasn't sure about was the file locking. If using 'score' is this purely read only? The file permissions I have set allow both (in group users) to read to the database, even though only one user has write access. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642