Re: A new use for Spamprobe - Interestingness vs Ho-hum Boring

Jack Bertram wrote:

> [...]I use ifile together with spamprobe to do exactly what the OP said.

I've used ifile with some success for filtering, and briefly tinkered 
with using it to separate out flames threads. It worked fine, but I 
eventually lost interest in maintaining it.

>It's not developed any more mostly because it's a very mature program -
>it's been around much longer than the current crop of spam classifiers.
>Ifile is not so effective for spam vs non-spam, because spam is not a
>uniform set, but I get around 98% accuracy filtering my mail into 50
>different mailboxes having split out spam first.
>  
>
As Jack noted, ifile doesn't seem so effective for spam filtering as for 
general classification and sorting.

- Bob

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642