consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:17:50 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I've been using spamprobe and spamassassin together for a while now. Works great. They agree an email is spam, I don't ever look at it. They agree it's good it goes in my inbox. They disagree I check it out. We've all seen the spams trying to fool bayesian filters by including a bunch of either quoted or specially generated text. I've started getting spams that I can easily identify by appearance, and spamprobe has flagged them *all* as good, even though I've retrained it on each one as it has come in. Here are the 9 all my spam filters have missed in the last 7 days: http://www.chaosreigns.com/sp/failed.mbox And the output of "spamprobe -T score" on the last one: http://www.chaosreigns.com/sp/574F51BA2F/score This isn't the first time I've seen this kind of thing. But it is the first time spamprobe has completely failed to adapt. Very little spam gets through my greylisting, spamprobe, *and* spamassassin. I have 12 more of these that were caught (only) by spamassassin since July 26th (via RBLs / razor). -- "You will need: a big heavy rock, something with a bit of a swing to it... perhaps Mars" - http://ned.ucam.org/~sdh31/misc/destroy.html http://www.ChaosReigns.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV