Re: consistant failures on a new kind of spam
Brian Burton <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:35:23 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
David A. Lee wrote:
> I do run regular cleanups
>
> daily 1 14
> weekly 3 60
> monthly 100000 180
>
> but I really just guessed these numbers. I understand why brian doesnt
> want to give us "the perfect numbers" to use because there are none ... but
> ... Honestly I have no clue even after using spamprobe for years how to pick
> the right numbers ...
Oh, I don't know. Seems like you have a good clue there!
If those cleanup settings keep you 85% full in a 40 MB file then to
float around 50% you should probably use
40 * 0.85 = x * 0.50
x = (40 * 0.85) / 0.5
x = 68 MB
At least I think that's right. :-)
Of course it assumes you've been holding at a steady state for a long time.
I agree that an auto-cleaning hash file with useful default settings is
a great idea. The ones you are using look pretty good to me. I guess I
need to figure out how to run experiments to find something like an
optimal value.
All the best,
++Brian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.1 (Build 1557)
Charset: ISO-8859-1
wsBVAwUBRVtr+zxRyEoJfXIFAQiLsAf+N5CFKyctk/M4/Bc7mdzO55yk6aNIeNNg
/8FHwiii1NbQoiZDF+uOflQOgJqmlxtKyVpymm+ZyreP00GKTtYZMBOMlx0Yt2DR
pdWfc3WH9FUs5NCuQV9HXTUUUqcrZm3yxZpjV1fsXH0VbKAzgljm3qcT80wTm/pi
6W6/yoFbn1y0tuhxiVyPbYUQEnmUK9KvSx7Iz9xInLJxAXW+QnFFr7emPB2VHFx5
vs2ze/Uq78WS6cN1Rbbqg/3pbAiUgvgeWVBMGKXjrDj2LR5ybBp7T5ZOa+BbAmrO
XQzPc1wF/l0TFWf1PF+5rlbqkOOvJMQrnmBMXK4wo99fK+D47HHTpQ==
=0z+3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV