Re: Why is this type of spam not caught?
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:15:36 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 21 Nov 2006, Matthias B. wrote: > On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:23:26 +0000 Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I'm getting lots of mail which always have the same first line in the > > body: > > > > Deborah has uploaded some new software for you! > > > > The name changes but the text remains the same. > > > > Apart from this there is a link to click plus a lot of randomly selected > > text related to free software. > > > > However many times I feed these to spamprobe it keeps failing to catch > > the next version that arrives. I should have thought the constant > > repetition of the first line would be a give-away. Is there any way to > > make spamprobe look out for a particular phrase like this? > > I have the same problem. I guess SP fails, because the body texts of these > messages seem to be copied together from posts to technical mailing lists > and therefore are very hammy. You wouldn't want a good mail discarded just > because the sender chose a bad subject and has a single spammy paragraph > in the mail (which could be a signature auto-appended by a freemail > service). > > These spams worry me very much, because if you keep training them as > spam they poison many good terms. E.g. on my SP database "lpd" has turned > into a spam term as have the phrases "boot floppy" and "source route". > These are terms that I would expect in ham messages on the kind of mailing > lists I read. Seeing them tagged as spam phrases gives me a bad feeling. > I'm just waiting for "FreeBSD" (seems to be contained in all of those > messages) to turn into a spam term. I hate to say it, but including random > snippets from Usenet or mailing list postings in spam was a very smart > move by the spammers. The interesting thing is that they chose technical > mailing lists as source. I don't think that's because the people reading > this kind of stuff are especially likely to fall for spam. Maybe it's > hostility towards the people who write and install antispam software, an > attempt to poison their ham terms to annoy them? > It's a beautiful illustration of Darwininsm in action! I resorted to putting the first line of the body into .procmailrc: # catch stuff with this line in body :0 B *has uploaded some new software for you! junkmail This works, but of course it caught your post too! Anthony -- Anthony Campbell - ac-MeA/[email protected] Microsoft-free zone - Using Linux Gnu-Debian http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews, on-line books and sceptical articles) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV