Re: Greylisting

"Jem" <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Dec 2006 19:22:55 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> So, if you run a busy server and want to reduce your load, grey listing
> is definitely worthwhile.  It's not a replacement for SP but it clearly
> has value in reducing your server load.

Definitely agree with that. Our university struggled for years with 
unreliable spam filtering, but enabling grey listing suddenly cut the spam 
volume dramatically WITHOUT causing false positives. Remember a statistical 
filter can still make awful mistakes if trained improperly or not trained 
enough... but greylisting only impacts improper SMTP delivery that lacks 
queues.

The only downside with greylisting is delay in receiving new emails. Even 
if you add a 5 minute delay, the other mail server will probably still wait 
for half an hour or more.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV