Re: Greylisting
"Jem" <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Dec 2006 19:22:55 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> So, if you run a busy server and want to reduce your load, grey listing > is definitely worthwhile. It's not a replacement for SP but it clearly > has value in reducing your server load. Definitely agree with that. Our university struggled for years with unreliable spam filtering, but enabling grey listing suddenly cut the spam volume dramatically WITHOUT causing false positives. Remember a statistical filter can still make awful mistakes if trained improperly or not trained enough... but greylisting only impacts improper SMTP delivery that lacks queues. The only downside with greylisting is delay in receiving new emails. Even if you add a 5 minute delay, the other mail server will probably still wait for half an hour or more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV