Re: Lots of false positives since transferring database

Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:14:53 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 05 Oct 2008, Chris Ross wrote:
>
> On Oct 5, 2008, at 9:17 AM, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>>> Have you tried "spamprobe -T summarize" on the false positives?
>>> Does the score change if you specify "-H none"?
>>> This may give some hints about what is happening.
>>>
>> It doesn't change. I get this:
>>
>> Score: 0.9999968
>>       Spam Prob   Count    Good    Spam  Word
>>       0.9999947      10       0      10  seller
>>       0.9999979       5       0      25  leave
>>       0.9999978       4       0      24  transaction
>>
>> After tellling SP it was good, I get:
>>
>> Score: 0.0000031
>>       Spam Prob   Count    Good    Spam  Word
>>       0.0000010      10      10       0  seller
>>       0.0000010       4      14       0  marketplace
>>       0.0000010       4       4       0  leave seller
>>       0.0000010       4       4       0  rating
>>
>>>
>>> spamprobe export/import should be independent of the database type  
>>> anyway.
>>> Did you create a new empty database before importing?
>>
>> Not as such. I just made ~/.spamprobe and copied all my spamprobe  
>> files
>> into that directory.
>>
>>
>> As far as I can see, SP thinks that all mail received on this computer
>> is spam until told otherwise.
>
>   More than that, it thinks each of the *terms* is spam until told  
> otherwise.  The normal export/import process would suggest you run  
> export on the machine you're moving away from, then run the import of  
> the new machine.  This will take care of any binary incompatibility  
> issues.  This almost looks like a byte-ordering problem to me.  Maybe a 
> 32-bit vs. 64-bit inconsistency?
>
>   What architectures and operating systems are you running on each  
> machine?  Do you have the opportunity to perform an export on the  
> original machine, and an import (into a clean .spamprobe) on the  
> destination machine?  I suspect that might resolve the situation.
>
>                                 - Chris

I can do this when I get home but at present I am abroad.  This is on a
Thinkpad Z61M running Debian (unstable). The machine at home is also
i386, Athlon processor, running the same software. I've only installed
32-bit stuff.

I will try your suggestion when I get back. It's annoying that my
attempt to compile SP on this machine doesn't work. Not sure why --
something to do with the gcc version I think.

Anthony

-- 
Anthony Campbell - ac-MeA/[email protected] 
Microsoft-free zone - Using Debian GNU/Linux
http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews, 
and sceptical articles)


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/