Re: Lots of false positives since transferring database
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]> Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:14:53 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 05 Oct 2008, Chris Ross wrote: > > On Oct 5, 2008, at 9:17 AM, Anthony Campbell wrote: >>> Have you tried "spamprobe -T summarize" on the false positives? >>> Does the score change if you specify "-H none"? >>> This may give some hints about what is happening. >>> >> It doesn't change. I get this: >> >> Score: 0.9999968 >> Spam Prob Count Good Spam Word >> 0.9999947 10 0 10 seller >> 0.9999979 5 0 25 leave >> 0.9999978 4 0 24 transaction >> >> After tellling SP it was good, I get: >> >> Score: 0.0000031 >> Spam Prob Count Good Spam Word >> 0.0000010 10 10 0 seller >> 0.0000010 4 14 0 marketplace >> 0.0000010 4 4 0 leave seller >> 0.0000010 4 4 0 rating >> >>> >>> spamprobe export/import should be independent of the database type >>> anyway. >>> Did you create a new empty database before importing? >> >> Not as such. I just made ~/.spamprobe and copied all my spamprobe >> files >> into that directory. >> >> >> As far as I can see, SP thinks that all mail received on this computer >> is spam until told otherwise. > > More than that, it thinks each of the *terms* is spam until told > otherwise. The normal export/import process would suggest you run > export on the machine you're moving away from, then run the import of > the new machine. This will take care of any binary incompatibility > issues. This almost looks like a byte-ordering problem to me. Maybe a > 32-bit vs. 64-bit inconsistency? > > What architectures and operating systems are you running on each > machine? Do you have the opportunity to perform an export on the > original machine, and an import (into a clean .spamprobe) on the > destination machine? I suspect that might resolve the situation. > > - Chris I can do this when I get home but at present I am abroad. This is on a Thinkpad Z61M running Debian (unstable). The machine at home is also i386, Athlon processor, running the same software. I've only installed 32-bit stuff. I will try your suggestion when I get back. It's annoying that my attempt to compile SP on this machine doesn't work. Not sure why -- something to do with the gcc version I think. Anthony -- Anthony Campbell - ac-MeA/[email protected] Microsoft-free zone - Using Debian GNU/Linux http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews, and sceptical articles) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/