train-good and train-spam; cron error
John Chandler <jpc-WwYSd80vZ+3bI6/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
1) I've changed my .procmailrc from using "receive",
as recommended in an early version of the documentation,
to using "train" as now recommended.
I think I understand the reasoning for that recommendation.
The documentation still recommends using "good" and "spam"
for the initial training and for later corrrective training.
Would the use of "train-good" or "train-spam"
in initially training spamprobe
or in later corrective sessions be appropriate,
in order better to control the size of the database?
If not, could "train-good" and "train-spam" perhaps be used
for just the latter part of the initial training?
(That is, train on one small "good" file and one small "spam" file,
then switch to "train-good" and "train-spam" and train some more.)
After the initial training, my sp_words database
is about 60 megabytes.
2) My cron job ran fine for seven months,
but recently it has given the following error in every run.
Your "cron" job on csa
/usr/local/bin/spamprobe cleanup 4 14
produced the following output:
warning: berkeley db reported error: c_get: I/O error (5)
I have deleted and rebuilt the "lock" and "sp_words" files
every day for the past few days, but it hasn't helped.
Our sysmgr has run out of ideas.
We are running spamprobe 1.0 on Solaris 9.
Any suggestions of things to try?
-----
John Chandler
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/