Re: Spamprobe 1.1x6 released
"David A. Lee" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <00d501c533a8$3866f140$0501a8c0@ENTERPRISE> |
If global options are used I'd rather it come from a file then the environment. I belive it is less errorprone to configure a file then the environment. Startup overhead to detect if a file exists is negliable IMHO, and when it exists it is very small to read in a few lines. > Guillaume Laurent wrote: > > On Monday 28 March 2005 16:53, Brian Burton wrote: > >>Maybe there ought to be a SPAMPROBE_OPTS environment variable for > >>options that should be used everytime SP is run? > > > > Or a very simple ~/.spamproberc. > > I've always resisted adding the startup overhead of parsing a config > file. Maybe that's silly though. > > > ++Brian > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Spamprobe-users mailing list > Spamprobe-users-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamprobe-users > ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click