Re: Spamprobe 1.1x6 released

Also a global config file would be nice which provides systemwide defaults


All that said I probably wouldnt use a config file ... as I tend to wrap spamprobe in a shell script ...
(which is probably way higher overhead then reading a config file :( )

> > If global options are used I'd rather it come from a file then the
> > environment. I belive it is less errorprone to configure a file then the
> > environment.
> 
> I'd agree with that, with the environment then depending what environment 
> you're running in (procmail, bash, web/cgi) you would get different 
> behavior.
> 
> I doubt there would be too much overhead using a configuration file. As 
> pointed out, procmail does that too. Also, spambayes does the same thing 
> (keeps things consistent looking with procmail usage)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Spamprobe-users mailing list
> Spamprobe-users-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamprobe-users
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click