Re: spamprobe-1.1x7 released

"Jem" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> OK.  Thanks for all of the feedback on 1.1x6!  I've just uploaded a new
> release that has some fixes and changes requested by Jem and others.
> http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/spamprobe/spamprobe-1.1x7.tar.gz?down
> load

I have been trying out 1.1x7, in fact I backed up my PBL database, and 
imported to hash format to try it on a live system getting lots of mail. 
It's only been running for a few hours so far but all seems good at the 
moment. The speed improvement, for instance doing spamprobe score on a 
directory full of files, is noticeable.

Also, I built spamprobe without either DB or PBL. It works fine :) One 
question,

I'm using train mode in procmail and periodic cleanups in crontab. I'm also 
trying to evaluate how "full" my hash database is. What's a good way to 
check this? I thought of something like spamprobe export | wc -l, in order 
to count the number of terms (one per line). Then you said the size 
occupied is approximately the number of terms * 24 bytes? Is that right?




-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.