Re: spamprobe-1.1x7 released

Jacob S wrote:
> A hash db exported from the 64bit and imported on the 32bit before being
> re-exported returned the exact same size when doing an ls -l. The same
> was true when a hash db was built on the 32 bit system, imported on the
> 64 bit and re-exported. 

Excellent.


> However, building a hash DB directly from the spam bank on each system,
> exporting it and running an ls -l on them showed a 44.4KB difference
> between the two. The 32bit hash export was the smaller of the two. The
> differences all seemed to be of the following form: 
> 
> 2,0,960,"I0xed54fbe0"
> 0,1,960,"I0x96551cfa"

My guess is that the evahash (the hash algorithm I'm using) generates 
different hash codes on 64 and 32 bit systems.  44.4k would be a big 
difference though!  If you run wc -l on both export files what were the 
numbers (i.e. how many terms in each db)?

Thanks,
++Brian


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc:
A global provider of Threat Management Solutions.
Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today!
http://www.demarc.com/info/Sentarus/hamr30