Re: spamprobe-1.1x7 released

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:13:13 -0500
Brian Burton <[email protected]> wrote:

> > However, building a hash DB directly from the spam bank on each
> > system, exporting it and running an ls -l on them showed a 44.4KB
> > difference between the two. The 32bit hash export was the smaller of
> > the two. The differences all seemed to be of the following form: 
> > 
> > 2,0,960,"I0xed54fbe0"
> > 0,1,960,"I0x96551cfa"
> 
> My guess is that the evahash (the hash algorithm I'm using) generates 
> different hash codes on 64 and 32 bit systems.  44.4k would be a big 
> difference though!  If you run wc -l on both export files what were
> the  numbers (i.e. how many terms in each db)?

Here's the numbers for each db:

32bit - 519,040
64bit - 521,061

Any more tests I should do?

Thanks,
Jacob


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc:
A global provider of Threat Management Solutions.
Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today!
http://www.demarc.com/info/Sentarus/hamr30