Re: spamprobe-1.1x7 released
Jacob S <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:12:53 -0500 Brian Burton <[email protected]> wrote: > Jacob S wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:36:59 -0500 > > Brian Burton <[email protected]> wrote: > >>* Changed the default hash file size to 32 megs to give people more > >>growing room. > > > > Do we still need to double the the db size when used on 64bit > > processors? I'm about to do some testing on a Sparc64 running Debian > > Linux. > > The record size in a hash database should be the same on 64 bit > processors as it is on 32 bit processors. I haven't tested that > though since I don't have a 64 bit system to test on. > > A great test to run would be to build a hash database on a 32 bit > system, export that to a file, import that file into a database on a > 64 bit system, export on that 64 bit system to a new file and then > diff the two export files. They should be identical. hmm... I was thinking previously (with PBL) the size difference was only noticed when doing a du/ls -l on the db. When exported to a text file, both dbs were the same size. Is there something different about hashing that I don't know about, or is this a case where I don't know anything and should keep quiet? :-) Thanks, Jacob ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click