Re: SpamProbe 1.2 released
Anthony Campbell <ac-MeA/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 22 Jun 2005, Brian Burton wrote: > Anthony Campbell wrote: > >On 22 Jun 2005, Jem wrote: > >>>The 32 bit hash database is now "official" so I can't really change it > >>>anymore. I'd like to add a 64 bit hash file option later but I've been > >> > >>I've been using v1.1x7 with your new Hashed-array-cached database for 3 > >>months and have not seen any problems. I am using a fixed 16 MB database > >>and the accuracy is just as good as before, with a much larger PBL db. > >> > > > >So am I, except that I used a 32MB database. But I see that Brian's > >advice is to use pbl in general so I'm thinking of changing. I'm a bit > >worried about running out of space eventually. > > The primary reason I recommend PBL over hash if you have enough disk > space is that with PBL there is no chance for ambiguity in the database. > The hash stores 32-bit hash code not the terms themselves so you can > get collisions. This is most dangerous if it happens that a message > digest (used by SP to remember how it counted a particular message's > terms) collides with another word and you decide to retrain that message. > > Is that really going to be a problem for people? So far I haven't seen > any problem with this in my own database. In my recommendations in the > readme I try to be conservative so that average users don't get in over > their heads and yell at me. :-) > > The best of both worlds is probably the split database type. That uses > a hash file for the message terms and a tiny PBL (or BDB) database for > the message digests. I might switch to that for my own email. > > All the best, > ++Brian Thanks for this clarification. I still feel that the better flexibility of pbl (i.e. you can see the original terms) is quite an advantage. On a different note, I've found the -H option to be extremely useful for catching the huge number of bounced mails that I'm getting now. By filtering on the "Return-Path" header I get every single one of them! Anthony -- ac-MeA/[email protected] || http://www.acampbell.org.uk for using Linux GNU/Debian || blog, book reviews, electronic Microsoft-free zone || books and skeptical articles ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click