Re: SpamProbe 1.2 released
Thomas Schürger <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > What kind of bounces do you mean? What is the effect of filtering on > > the Return-Path header? I'm not sure in which situations this header > > is used in mails (is it supposed to be the envelope FROM address in > > certain situations?). Most of the mails in my inbox don't include that > > header. > > > > Would that header be a candidate for being included in the standard > > set of headers scanned by spamprobe? > > Most of mine don't contain the line either. But in the last week or so > I've been getting over 100 bounces from unknown recipients, presumably > due to a "joe job". I found that all of these bounces contained the > following first two header lines: > > From [email protected] Wed Jun 22 10:24:59 2005 > Return-Path: [email protected] > > No other emails have these lines. I assume they are added by my mail > server. I don't suppose it would be a good idea to include it in the > standard headers list but it might be worth documenting. Wouldn't spamprobe take care of that already by inspecting the From line (or From: header) and Received: header? By the way: Does spamprobe scan the From line (first line of a mail containing the envelope FROM and the reception date) or the From: header? Or both? The database seems to only contain one kind of from (terms starting with "Hfrom_"). Greetings, Thomas. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click