Re: What's the best way to process missed spams ?
Guillaume Laurent <glaurent-PnMVE5gNl/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
David A. Lee wrote: >Not entirely sure what your question is ... are you saying you dont think its right that spamprobe finds the headers as even more >informative then the body text ? > > In that case, yes. None of the info in the headers is particularly helpful to detect this particular spam, since it changes almost every time. The only header which doesn't change (the Subjec:) isn't taken into account. So a spam with the exact same subject and text, not even obfuscated by HTML tags, goes undetected almost every time even though I've explicitely flagged as 'spam' all its previous occurrences. -- Guillaume http://telegraph-road.org ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click