Re: What's the best way to process missed spams ?

Brian Burton wrote:
> The original top terms array had some terms in it that probably should 
> have been very spammy.  My guess is that there was a message or two that 
> were misclassified as spam earlier and were not corrected.

<sigh>

I meant to say "misclassified as HAM earlier..."

Need to proof read before hitting send.

All the best,
++Brian



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click