Re: That amd64 segfault again

As long as you are only adding this patch
to the Debian package, I shouldn't think that there
is a portability problem, Debian uses the same
glibc version on all its support platforms, or don't they?

But generally I think that I would be more portable
if you just used %d and a type cast, the numbers
involved should always be less than MAX_INT, and explicit
type casting like that shouldn't break code anywhere...


On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 10:38 +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> I thought I should attach the patch I'm about to apply to libspf2 in Debian. I 
> started with the patch posted by Thomas Jacob to the Debian bug report 
> (http://bugs.debian.org/392793) and merged with the one from Herbert Straub. 
> Then I moved the changes that just cast the arguments to SPF_Infof() and 
> SPF_Debugf() into a separate patch and instead changed the format strings. 
> But how portable is the z flag to printf()? (From the manpage: "A following 
> integer conversion corresponds to a size_t or ssize_t argument.").

-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=1007

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBGB5FrgF9cFv867HwRAkd4AKDAK38avH3JsJb5LVNNJFtq9q8SqACfWiXG
asAALj/xC8qULzCRJrydRWM=
=lXQ9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----