Re: That amd64 segfault again

On Monday 26 March 2007 16:44, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Monday 26 March 2007 05:24, Thomas Jacob wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 10:38 +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > > I thought I should attach the patch I'm about to apply to libspf2 in
> > > Debian. I started with the patch posted by Thomas Jacob to the Debian
> > > bug report (http://bugs.debian.org/392793) and merged with the one from
> > > Herbert Straub. Then I moved the changes that just cast the arguments
> > > to SPF_Infof() and SPF_Debugf() into a separate patch and instead
> > > changed the format strings. But how portable is the z flag to printf()?
> >
> > But generally I think that I would be more portable
> > if you just used %d and a type cast, the numbers
> > involved should always be less than MAX_INT, and explicit
> > type casting like that shouldn't break code anywhere...
>
> I think the more portable the better.  It would also make the patches more
> useful upstream once they (he) restarts maintaining libspf2.

I'll do so, especially for this reason.

-- 
Magnus Holmgren        [email protected]
                       (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)

-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=1007

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBGCQzSk7mRNn1h4+YRAruWAJ4kDjGIMyktqaH6Mb1u1znv3Xt0nACeKg+d
7ZC48/Vzzm9G1zenXeo/4vw=
=J2lt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----