Re: incorrect Received-SPF format
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Frank Ellermann wrote: > Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > > 2007Mar27 16:14:00 [7091] Received-SPF: PermError (mail.bmsi.com: > > permanent error in processing domain of novoe-a.net: empty domain:) > > client-ip=63.175.28.197; > > envelope-from="[email protected]"; helo=novoe-d.net; > > receiver=mail.bmsi.com; problem="a:"; identity=mailfrom; > > x-helo-spf=permerror; > > If problem="something" is a good idea we should add it to 4408bis. > I think it's clear in the spec. that new parameters are expected > to be defined (or to be tested, using x-name=value) We can do that without problems. No pun intended. However, "problem" may not be the best name. Perhaps: syntax-error-in="a:"? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGCZIdwL7PKlBZWjsRAtj2AKCtQPajb6uCzosNohXx0LqZQHwr/ACfZz/t 6QDG8tiPJM5oCB9OQCTEEzg= =GvCR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=1007