Re: Local policy - disallowing +all
Jeremy Jackson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1189692953.20777.135.camel@ragnarok> |
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 09:58 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Thursday 13 September 2007 09:48, Jeremy Jackson wrote: > > Since implementing milter-greylist here a few weeks ago, the few spams > > that have reached my Inbox here have been from domains (presumably owned > > by or targeted by spammers) with SPF records ending in "+all" > > > > I see there is some ability to add local policy, but it seems like it > > would need to be extended to be a general purpose filter that could be > > used to remove the "+all" when being used by milter-greylist for > > auto-whitelisting, for example. > > A better approach, I think, would be to keep a list of domains that get SPF > Pass that spam you and just reject mail from those domains. As we've Well this is becoming a job like writing virus definitions... never finished. It smells like a bad design if that's the case. > discussed previously, it's trivial to have a record equiavlent to +all that > doesn't look like it. I'll check the list archives, but if this is true, it seems like spammers will defeat it easily, once it becomes popular enough to matter to them. > Rather than special case +all, I think you'd get more mileage out of a more > general solution. Adding domains manually to a blacklist sounds like special case to me, I was hoping SPF would be a general solution... -- Jeremy Jackson Coplanar Networks (519)489-4903 ------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=6959932&id_secret=41510436-949da6 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com