Re: "Last Call" pending exp= (empty) erratum
"Frank Ellermann" <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:57:49 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Julian Mehnle wrote:
> %{h} can never yield an empty <target-name>.
If there's no HELO / EHLO at all, or just the verb without a name, then
%{h} would be empty / undefined. That's an SMTP syntax error, but
receivers could nevertheless decide to talk to the client.
Likely there are more plausible examples how <target-name> could
end up "empty" or otherwise unusable.
[...]
> RFC 4408 implies a result of "Fail" for the above example of yours,
> and this is what Mail::SPF does.
Okay, toss a coin between option 2 and 3 for this erratum ? Or we
could use Ned's trick, your proposal (option 2) is shorter, and if in
doubt shorter wins. (Disclaimer, Ned uses that for spelling issues ;-)
Frank
-------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=6959932&id_secret=67890038-8559fe
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com