Re: Re: "Last Call" pending exp= (empty) erratum
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:22:25 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Frank Ellermann wrote: > Fine, then we'll make it so, 2 and 3 are equivalent. I'll change > the errata page in the next days, leaving only your solution, maybe > combining the rationale for 2+3 if necessary. After that I'll set > a timeout for objections, and if nothing happens in a week or so I > move this erratum to resolved. I'll add test cases for how I understand the proposed solution. My understanding is that 'exp=' results in PermError, whereas errors resulting from macro expansion, DNS or faulty exp string result in exp= being ignored. -- Stuart D. Gathman <[email protected]> Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154 "Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial. ------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=6959932&id_secret=69130320-7a5c75 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com