Fw: RFC2821 Implementation Survey

"Frank Ellermann" <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Dec 2007 01:42:22 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spf.devel
Organization <http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Message-ID <[email protected]>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Crocker" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: gmane.ietf.general
To: <[email protected]>; "MAAWG technical" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 5:30 PM
Subject: RFC2821 Implementation Survey


> Greetings.
> 
> The IETF will shortly be considering elevating the revised SMTP specification
> RFC 2821, to the second-level standards status of DRAFT.
> 
> A requirement for this is to produce information about implementations of the
> protocol specification.  It is therefore essential that we assemble a credible
> collection of information about actual development and interoperability
> testing -- and deployment is a form of testing -- for RFC 2821.
> 
> Because SMTP is a rich and widely-deployed protocol, the goal of this query is
> to ask for enough information to be useful, but not to place undue burden on
> responders by asking them to do a massive checklist.
> 
> It is assumed that most implementations of RFC 2821 have implemented all of
> its required (MUST) features and probably a fair number of its optional
> (SHOULD or MAY) features.
> 
> This survey does NOT cover any specifications outside of the RFC2821 document
> itself.  No enhancements, options, or the like.
> 
> Please take some time to complete the following questionnaire and send me a
> private note with your responses.  I will assemble them into a public report:
> 
> Please respond by 10 December 2007.
> 
> 
> 
> RFC 2821 Implementation Questionnaire
> =====================================
> 
> 
>     0. Contact and Description
> 
>        Organization Name:
> 
>        Implementation (Software or Service) Name:
> 
> 
>     1. Have you implemented RFC2821?
> 
> 
>     2. For how long it has been deployed?
> 
> 
>     3. What features have NOT been implemented from RFC2821?
> 
> 
>     4. What features of RFC2821 are problematic for your implementation?
> 
> 
>     5. Please add any other comments you wish to share:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> d/
> -- 
> 
>    Dave Crocker
>    Brandenburg InternetWorking
>    bbiw.net

-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/1007/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/1007/
Modify Your Subscription: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=6959932&id_secret=71345068-752f8c
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com