Re: IPv6 root DNS change

Stuart D. Gathman wrote:

> I understand it is too late, since we already mentioned 512
> in the rfc.  But maybe a SHOULD support at least 811...

Of course 4408bis could adjust 512 to 811 if that's *really*
common practice at this time (for the reasons stated by you).

But what should the remaining receivers limited to what UDP
offers do ?  They get a truncated policy.  What do existing
implementations in this case if they don't pull "MAY ignore"
in the RFC ?  Caveat, my DNS knowledge is extremely limited,
I hope for a simple answer :-)  

 Frank

-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/1007/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/1007/
Modify Your Subscription: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=6959932&id_secret=83623114-debfe5
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com