Re: IPv6 root DNS change

Stuart D. Gathman wrote:

> Be strict in what you transmit, lax in what you receive.
 
> Obviously, you would publish 512 records for some time yet,
> but libraries would be adjusted and tested for 811 (or maybe 1024 
> for a little growth, since the 811 includes only 3 IPv6 records,
> and more will be needed if IPv6 takes off).

Oh, another case of "SHOULD NOT generate" (= publish) coupled
with "SHOULD accept" (where possible, as explained by Julian).

Yes, that's okay, and using 1024 is more convincing than 811.
Odd, EDNS0 is apparently still "only" at PS (RFC 2671), no DS.
 
 Frank

-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/1007/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/1007/
Modify Your Subscription: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=6959932&id_secret=83664535-52aa32
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com